Energy Source

     Petroleum energy has become one of the major issues in this year’s presidential campaign.  It has been an issue for a long time, but it appears that the candidates are offering different solutions for the problem.  I’m not extremely happy with either one.  Seems like the Democrats want to offer us pennies (a compensation at the gas pumps), to ease the pressure of the cost of gas.  The Republicans want to run offshore and start drilling.  That not only sounds like a lot of extra cost, money coming from somewhere or somebody, it has a tendency to upset the greenies (conservationists, trees, air, sea, etc…).  The U.S.G.S. issued a report back in April of this year, I found out about this from a post on a forum I frequent, that stated that there is an oil supply in this country in a location called the “Bakken Formation” that contains 25 times more than it did in the 1995 estimate, according to the U.S.G.S.  This amount is somewhere between 3 to 4.3 Billion Barrels of Technically Recoverable Oil.  I have heard it said that this enough, with the rest of the oil deposits between Alaska’s north coast to the Gulf of Mexico to fulfill Americas’ petroleum needs for the next 20 to 30 years, and that the oil in this formation is of a quality good enough to reduce production costs enough that it could mean a drop in the price of oil from over $100 dollars a barrel to less than $20 dollars a barrel.  Now this could really ease the cost at the pumps.  Although the oil companies, I have heard said that the price of oil has no bearing on the cost of gas, I fail to see how the drop in the cost of oil that gas is made from of more than $80 dollars couldn’t affect the production cost of gas.  Now if you would like to verify this, please do.  Don’t take mine or anyone else’s word for it.  Check it out for yourself.  I wont even give you a link.  Just access any search engine and key in United States Geological Survey and let it lead you to their official site.  When you get there, click on the “Newsroom” tab and look for the report released on 4/10/2008 concerning the aforementioned formation and follow their links to get the whole story.  Happy reading, and don’t forget to pass the information on and bring it to the attention of certain political parties and let’s see if anyone can take a hint.  Maybe they will stop trying to cost us more money or give us baby pacifiers.  If all that I’ve read and heard is true, then someone in government is either choosing to ignore the report or they’re hoping the public doesn’t find out about it.  There are already wells pumping from this source.  It seems that it would be a lot cheaper to put a few more wells here in strategic locations than to go looking offshore. It would also go a lot further that a small kickback at the pumps.  It should also keep us running until someone could come up with a feasible alternative that would satisfy everyone’s requirements.

Comments

     I just finished reading, or I should say, trying to discern some intelligible communication in 23 different comments with 23 different names all from the same IP address.  Which makes me wonder if whomever is posting these comments is actually the person whose name is attached to the comment or is it some-ONE who isn’t courageous enough to use their own name and wishes to remain anonymous.  In either case, the words, I guess you could call them that, all appear to to be a combination of gibberish, combined words to make one word, or a conglomeration of letters arranged to simulate words but are somewhat dubious.  The combination of names, words?, and lists upon lists of web addresses make me also wonder if they may be spammers or possibly hackers or someone trying to get me to respond to something in order to install a virus or worm or other malicious program in my blog or even my computer.  Which makes me think I should just delete them as spam and turn the IP address in as a possible threat.  If these are legitimate people using one computer, they need to post their comments in plain English and refer to the post or posts they are commenting about.  Otherwise, they need, to coin an old cliche, “TAKE A HIKE”.   I don’t mind and even welcome comment about what I write, but if you’re going to comment, do it in some semblance of intelligible communication that I can respond too, likewise.  Tell me, what do you think I should do with comments like these.  And please, intelligent responses only, the kind I can read and make sense of.  Thank you.

                                                                                                                 Harry

P.S.  It would be nice if the comments that I am receiving from the I.P. 200 address could be written in intelligible English.  Can you not write in English or are you having a translation problem?  I hope the latter is the problem.  I hate to think that someone that can write English is no more capable of vocabulary articulation than that.